Unemployment Insurance Costs Likely to Rise
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes provisions that will increase unemployment benefit payments and provide incentives for states to expand the number of individuals eligible for unemployment benefits.
ARRA extends the current emergency unemployment insurance program through the end of May 2010. Unlike the existing program, however, the ARRA extension is financed through federal general revenue, not through unemployment tax revenue. Because it adds 33 weeks of benefits in all states, it could greatly increase the number of people who file for benefits and who stay on unemployment for the maximum period allowed under state law. That would result in significantly higher state UI payouts and higher unemployment tax rates.
ARRA also adds $25 to weekly UI benefit payments. The increase will continue through the end of June 2010.
ARRA would transfer $7 billion in unemployment tax funds to the states that have certain provisions in their UI laws designed to expand benefits. One-third of the $7 billion is contingent on whether the state has adopted an "alternative base period" rule requiring the state to include the most recently completed calendar quarter in determining an individual's UI eligibility in cases where the use of a base period that doesn't include the most recent calendar quarter would render the person ineligible. The provision is designed to protect seasonal and short-term employees.
Washington, DC, and 18 states currently have alternative base period rules that meet the criteria: Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin. Legislatures in four states-California, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania-are considering changing their laws to qualify.
Some states may elect not to receive the money because the long-term effect of such provisions on their administrative costs, benefit payouts, and employer tax rates outweighs the short-term benefits.
States that face severe trust fund shortfalls, such as California, will likely take the money.
To be eligible for the remaining two-thirds of the transfer payments, the state UI law must contain at least two of the following provisions:
* A provision that UI benefits can't be denied to individuals seeking only part-time work if they worked primarily part-time during the base period
* A provision barring denial of benefits if separation is for compelling family reasons such as the illness or disability of an immediate family member
* A provision requiring 26 weeks of additional benefits for individuals who have exhausted their regular benefits but are making satisfactory progress in a training program for a "high-demand" job
* A provision requiring dependent benefits of at least $15 per dependent per week
For further information regarding the effect of the stimulus law on their UI rates, staffing firms should contact their state UI department.
Contact information for each state is available on the U.S. Department of Labor's Employment and Training
Administration Web site, doleta.gov
<http://communications.americanstaffing.net/t/48936/2475576/678/0/> .
|